I recently read Lolita and was really conflicted as to whether I liked it or not. In one sense it was an uncomfortable read but I found I couldn’t put it down. I see a lot of people saying that they hate it because Humbert is such a monster but surely that’s the point? Nabokov makes it such an uncomfortable read through putting it in first person; we are meant to slightly sympathise with Humbert (because of his unreliable narration) and then feel disgusted with ourselves. Combined with the ‘American Dream’/Academia/Psychological Thriller aesthetic it’s almost as much a mockery of society and its romanticisation of crime as The Secret History. This is even proven by Lolita’s resurgence in popular aesthetics and romanticisation.

  • sublunari@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    American authors tend to be pushed on the public quite hard if they are anti-communist, and they get pushed even harder if the are anti-communists who come from communist countries, as Nabokov did. He’s a pretty amazing stylist, the last gasp of 19th century symbolism and decadence, but his politics are abominable (he was pro-Vietnam War), and this is why his most famous work is about a child molester. Better Russian authors like Chernyshevsky and Sholokhov are unknown to American audiences because, unlike Nabokov, they are actually on the political left.