I recently read Lolita and was really conflicted as to whether I liked it or not. In one sense it was an uncomfortable read but I found I couldn’t put it down. I see a lot of people saying that they hate it because Humbert is such a monster but surely that’s the point? Nabokov makes it such an uncomfortable read through putting it in first person; we are meant to slightly sympathise with Humbert (because of his unreliable narration) and then feel disgusted with ourselves. Combined with the ‘American Dream’/Academia/Psychological Thriller aesthetic it’s almost as much a mockery of society and its romanticisation of crime as The Secret History. This is even proven by Lolita’s resurgence in popular aesthetics and romanticisation.

  • pondrthis@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Humbert Humbert is an amazing protagonist. He’s fun, he’s wacky, he’s witty, and of course yes, he is a monster.

    People are able to read and appreciate Paradise Lost, Grendel, and heck, the Bible, all of which have protagonists that do evil things but present themselves as the victims. (Actually, it’s been a while on Grendel, that one might have genuinely portrayed Grendel as innocent.)