I was talking to a friend about comedic / farcical literature the other day, and Catch-22 by Joseph Heller came up. That made me remember - I first read this book when I was about 15 years old. Or rather I read about 80% of it, didn’t quite finish it that time. I forced myself through it because I had heard it was subversive and intelligent and challenging, and I got nothing out of it. I didn’t see the humor, I didn’t get any political commentary, it was just a series of absurd things happening to absurd characters with no rhyme or reason.

I reread that book two years ago and damn near pissed myself laughing on every other page, but then the ending rolled around and it hit so hard. That sudden switch from absurdist comedy to heavy, bleak, depressing, and then he gives you just this glimmer of hope at the end anyway. I found it absolutely brilliant, and yet I kept thinking back to how none of this connected with me when I first read it.

Do you have books like that? Books that just plain went over your head, that you didn’t have the maturity to appreciate, that were too difficult in style or subject matter, and that you’ve come to appreciate years later?

  • Simplythegirl98@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I tried reading Les Miserables at 15 because I watched the movie for extra credit in my French class and I put it down because I didn’t understand anything lol. I tried again at 20 and I understood more but never read the whole thing. Maybe next year I’ll give it another go. I also read Catch 22 at 18 and didn’t really get it so I want to read it again. I read Flowers in the attic at 12 because my sister who was 14 was reading it and I was not ready for that at all.