I was talking to a friend about comedic / farcical literature the other day, and Catch-22 by Joseph Heller came up. That made me remember - I first read this book when I was about 15 years old. Or rather I read about 80% of it, didn’t quite finish it that time. I forced myself through it because I had heard it was subversive and intelligent and challenging, and I got nothing out of it. I didn’t see the humor, I didn’t get any political commentary, it was just a series of absurd things happening to absurd characters with no rhyme or reason.

I reread that book two years ago and damn near pissed myself laughing on every other page, but then the ending rolled around and it hit so hard. That sudden switch from absurdist comedy to heavy, bleak, depressing, and then he gives you just this glimmer of hope at the end anyway. I found it absolutely brilliant, and yet I kept thinking back to how none of this connected with me when I first read it.

Do you have books like that? Books that just plain went over your head, that you didn’t have the maturity to appreciate, that were too difficult in style or subject matter, and that you’ve come to appreciate years later?

  • No-vem-ber@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Shakespeare, chaucer… Didn’t see any of the humour at all as a teenager, and learning it in class didn’t help.

    Now reading them as an adult, I’m cackling

    • twowugen@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      my best takeaway from Shakespeare is when Hamlet asks the gravedigger (who doesn’t know he’s talking to Hamlet) “upon what ground” Hamlet lost his wits, and the gravedigger is all “whY, hErE iN DEnmArK”. what a nice epiphany to realize shakespeare’s humor is supposed to be a little dumb at times, as it should be accesible to the masses