My friends and I were having a discussion about our favourite books and we talked about “being too late” to appreciate a book. I kind of get the sentiment and was wondering if others agree. So one of my favourite books of all time is Perks of Being a Wallflower and read it when I was 17 and I remember just thinking about it for a long time and always going back to it. It just cut so deep unlike anything else. I wondered if I had read it now at 29 if it would have nearly the same impact.

Also, I read Looking For Alaska for the first time this year and while I enjoyed it, I found myself wondering how blown away I would have been reading it as a teenager. I just know I would have appreciated it so much more and while I still love John Green I don’t know if his books will ever hit me the same again.

On the other hand, I’m sure there are books that I didn’t appreciate before that I certainly would now!

  • Matilda-17@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Yes. I was 18 when Harry Potter first started getting notice (before the 4th book came out, or the first film.) I wished I’d had them as a child.