As an adult, it’s been a constant source of frustration to me that there are huge gaps in my knowledge when it comes to literature that other people of my generation have read - either through school, or because they were popular at the time, or because they’re regarded as “classics”*

But it wasn’t like I didn’t read as a kid. I read A LOT. But the funny thing was, I was really specific about what I read.

For example, Jaws by Peter Benchley. I read that as an 11-12 year old and loved it. And then I read it 6 times in a row. Did I read anything else of his? Of course not. Wasn’t interested.

Or the Point Horror series (because I’m too old for Goosebumps!). I absolutely devoured them, but only the ones by R.L.Stein. Why? Because I read one of his first. That’s literally it.

Anyone else had this relationship with books as a kid?

*don’t worry, I know this is often more to do with matters of capitalism/patriarchy/colonialism than quality.

  • hocfutuis@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I read a lot, but, as a pre internet kid in regional Australia, it was limited to what the library had - which was quite a random selection.

    I don’t regret not reading many of the classics as a youngster. I feel like I genuinely enjoy and understand them more now I’m older.