I’m super curious, what do you guys make of the very ending of the Grapes of Wrath when >!Rose of Sharon (Rosasharn) breastfeeds the Starving Man!< in the barn? Her “mysterious smile” that she gives? (They cut this from the movie for some reason but not the play)
I think it works on two levels: one, a super pragmatic reasoning, that her breastmilk would go to waste otherwise and at least feeding the Starving Man would help. It’s better than nothing. The other ties into Steinbeck’s message that humans are all one group at the end of the day and things like race, class, gender, etc. are rendered meaningless when desperation happens and we need to help one another in dire times. Rose gives part of herself to a complete stranger (which also calls to mind imagery of the Virgin Mary).
I also think it happens because these two are at their lowest point in the book/play. The Starving Man has been reduced back to that of a helpless infant, in a way. Much like when people crawl into the fetal position, or they cry out for their mothers when they’re in danger, it sort of works on a very primal level as well. And Rose, having >!lost her baby in the scene right before this one!< is sick and grieving, I think this sort of helps her with her grief as well.
What do you guys think? I don’t know what to make of the “mysterious” smile she gives.

  • johneb22@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well said…I agree with your thoughts. I am also surprised ( and glad) that people still read that book. When people ask everyone for their favorite book this is mine. I get emotional when people do good things for people. Steinbeck has some in everyone of his books. When I tell people about the scene in the diner I tear up. “What’s it to ya”.