When I was a kid, I used to read a lot of books, usually cartoon books like The Magic Treehouse, Junie B Jones, Henry and Mudge, Big Nate, Diary of a Wimpy Kid, etc. However, as I got older, I stopped reading due to every Western fiction book aimed at people over the age of 12 being an unreadable wall of text. Every western cartoon book is aimed at children under the age of 12. If they added cartoons, it would be so much accessible and more readable. Imagine if they made a cartoon book about the Vietnam War. It would be heralded as not just a moving book, it would be considered one of the most moving pieces of media of all time. A picture is worth a thousand words for a reason. Nonfiction books already have this figured out. Instead of walls of unreadable text, they have illustrations and photos everywhere for better understanding. Cartoons are not just for kids. Grave of the Fireflies is an animated movie, but is one of the most moving and emotional war films ever made. Bloom county is a newspaper cartoon, yet it won a PULITZER PRIZE. East Asian countries have already figured this out. They have cartoon books for adults like Slayers, Monogatari, Haruhi Suzumiya, Baccano, Record of Lodoss War, ToraDora, and many more. I know some of you are typing a wall of text that says “um AKSCHUALLY read comic books 🤓” or “cartoons are exclusively for babies, books are meant to be imagined”. So western publishing industry, why do you think cartoons are for kids?

    • Several-Drag-7749@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I already said this, but I feel like they’re talking about picture books instead of comics. I know it’s a huge stretch regarding their rant, but it may be the case, especially since they’re talking about them being made for 10-year-olds.