I was reading George Eliot’s Felix Holt: The Radical last week and the Penguin paperback basically disintegrated. Toward the end I was picking up pages off the floor and reinserting them in a futile effort to keep some semblance of authorial intent.

And it occurred to me that while Penguin does us a huge service by making great texts cheaply available at least in some form, their books are deplorable as examples of book-making. Most of my extensive collection of Penguins make me unconsciously careful when I reach for them.

I compared that to my old paperback Ignatius Press series: fantastic paper, binding, stitching, glue. They’ve shown no sign of deterioration in decades of hard reading.

And that thought led me back to the old Everyman series: bound in leather, gorgeous books, and sturdy: I have two copies of Lord Dunsany’s Book of Wonder printed in the 1920’s and 1930’s that are in fine shape, though the paper is a lovely yellow and smells of vanillin in the best way.

I’ve got a few Bibles and a Quran that I’ve had forever: religious people are awfully careful to make sure their books last.

What are your best physical books?

  • noncedo-culli@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    This might just be anecdotal, but I’ve noticed that, in general, books printed in France tend to have better binding and be more durable than books printed in the US.

    My favorite physical book is a a 1855 copy of Ben Franklin’s autobiography and collected essays. There’s a note written in the front that it was awarded to a James Wilson in 1856 for having punctual attendance at his Bible class lol