In this book I’m reading the author argues that we are servants of the muses, and the art we produce is a result of their influence from a higher plane of existence. So when we sit down to write, what we’re actually writing are the words whispered to us from the muses. To connect with these muses, a writer must pray or engage in some sort of ritual. The most common way is to recite Homer’s invocation to Calliope.
This sounds weird to me. If this is true, shouldn’t all first drafts be considered an immediate masterpiece? If the work we produce comes from the muses, who are masters in their field, then the first draft should be a reflection of their skill. However, this is obviously not the case. First drafts aren’t always stellar. Does that mean the muses are not as good of a writer as we think they are?
You should check out Awakening From the Meaning Crisis by John Vervaeke. He argues there is an important spiritual part of being and knowing, that is partly or totally lacking in many people nowadays. And no that does not mean sky fairies. Even though you think people think sky fairies. It sounds to me like you would learn something from the series. I found it extremely humbling. He explains it way better than I ever could.
Even if spirits are totally a figment of the imagination, would that make them (or their impact) any less real? If you don’t believe in them, if you are Educated and know they are not there, then they’re not there. Maybe they even abandon you, who knows. You might suffer the consequences of that and not even know it. If you believe they are there, that could have a very real effect on your life. So then, aren’t they there, in a sense? It’s hard to explain. These are my undeveloped ideas, you should just listen to Vervaeke, not me.