amrit-9037@alien.topB to BooksEnglish · 1 year agoOpenAI And Microsoft Sued By Nonfiction Writers For Alleged ‘Rampant Theft’ Of Authors’ Workswww.forbes.comexternal-linkmessage-square106fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkOpenAI And Microsoft Sued By Nonfiction Writers For Alleged ‘Rampant Theft’ Of Authors’ Workswww.forbes.comamrit-9037@alien.topB to BooksEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square106fedilink
minus-squaresdf_iain@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoThey just have to pay royalties to all of the source material (it all contributes to the weights in the model). Isn’t it just like sampling music? I imagine with these large models it should be a few thousand percent of any revenue generated. Any output should be commercially non-viable.
minus-squaretaleo@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoThat would be like trying to sue any songwriter who learned I IV V I is a decent chord progression, or any artist that uses perspective.
minus-squaresdf_iain@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoWould make you think before using EVERYTHING as training data, wouldn’t it? There are no royalties on the public domain
They just have to pay royalties to all of the source material (it all contributes to the weights in the model). Isn’t it just like sampling music?
I imagine with these large models it should be a few thousand percent of any revenue generated. Any output should be commercially non-viable.
That would be like trying to sue any songwriter who learned I IV V I is a decent chord progression, or any artist that uses perspective.
Would make you think before using EVERYTHING as training data, wouldn’t it?
There are no royalties on the public domain