amrit-9037@alien.topB to BooksEnglish · 10 months agoOpenAI And Microsoft Sued By Nonfiction Writers For Alleged ‘Rampant Theft’ Of Authors’ Workswww.forbes.comexternal-linkmessage-square106fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkOpenAI And Microsoft Sued By Nonfiction Writers For Alleged ‘Rampant Theft’ Of Authors’ Workswww.forbes.comamrit-9037@alien.topB to BooksEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square106fedilink
minus-squareanamericandude@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 months agoIt’s funny you say that because now that I think about it, inspiration basically is advanced copy and paste
minus-squareIsa472@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 months agoExcept a human gets inspiration from their environment, their life, their emotions. Unique experiences. A bot only gets “inspiration” from other people’s work. And if that work is copyrighted… The author deserves compensation
minus-squareParksBrit@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 months agoYour argument boils doen to the fact humans have a more diverse data set. This is a terrible legal basis.
minus-squareIsa472@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 months agoWhat are you saying… It’s not about the amount of information, it’s about whether the source of information is copyrighted work or not. Monet cultivated his own garden and painted the famous water lillies. That is 100% original work. No argument possible
minus-squareParksBrit@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 months agoYour environment, emotions, and experiences are simply different forms of data and sources to pull from. Most stories are in some way inspired by other stories.
minus-squareIndependent-Yak1212@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 months agoThis is an oversimplification of both human cognition and how machines work.
It’s funny you say that because now that I think about it, inspiration basically is advanced copy and paste
Except a human gets inspiration from their environment, their life, their emotions. Unique experiences.
A bot only gets “inspiration” from other people’s work. And if that work is copyrighted… The author deserves compensation
Your argument boils doen to the fact humans have a more diverse data set. This is a terrible legal basis.
What are you saying… It’s not about the amount of information, it’s about whether the source of information is copyrighted work or not.
Monet cultivated his own garden and painted the famous water lillies. That is 100% original work. No argument possible
Your environment, emotions, and experiences are simply different forms of data and sources to pull from. Most stories are in some way inspired by other stories.
This is an oversimplification of both human cognition and how machines work.