I saw a video by Daniel Greene, where he says that paperbacks are actually more durable than paperbacks, and he swears that paperbacks are the way to go. What do you guys think? I’ve seen that the general consensus is that hardbacks are more durable, but after watching Daniel throw and stab both a paperback and a hardback, and watching the paperback stay mostly readable, I’m no longer sure. What do you guys think?

Thanks! :)

Edit: forgot to mention that after the abuse, the hardback fell apart, like entire pages fell from the spine but the paperback remained mostly ok, although very beat up, but perfectly readable.

  • NanditoPapa@alien.topBEnglish
    1·
    10 months ago

    I think hardback books are more durable than paperback books. Hardback books have covers made from a thick cardboard or cloth material, and the binding is stitched or stapled rather than glued. Hardback books can withstand daily wear and tear and the test of time better than paperback books, which are easier to rip, wrinkle and stain.

    Hardback books are also more resistant to environmental factors, such as humidity, heat and light, that can cause paper to deteriorate. If you want a book that will last longer and look nicer, hardback books are a better choice.