I was forced to read the Fellowship of the Ring in eighth grade, and I hated every goddamn word of it. I knew there was something in there I probably liked, but the pressure, time constraints, and looming chapter quizzes sucked any enjoyment there was to be had from that book.
Years later the movies came out, and as we all know they were incredible. I will never forget seeing the battle of Minas Tirith on the big screen, but I’ve also made so many wonderful memories over the years watching and rewatching those films with friends.
I developed a love for reading once school ended (go figure), but the lingering hatred for the Lord of the Rings books was too strong for me to jump back in to them. Then a few months ago I saw the trilogy on a bookshelf at my parent’s house, and figured they wouldn’t mind if I borrowed them.
I’m about 150 pages in, and man… it is so enjoyable to read these books today, after all these years. I still wish I could have enjoyed them as a young man, but I am soaking in the experience of truly reading The Lord of the Rings for the first time.
Some observations on the book as opposed to the movies:
- The pace is so much different. The first movie starts with a frantic pace, which I loved. The adventure shoots out the gate the day Frodo chances on the ring, every sequence in the film has clear and high stakes, and every scene bleeds into the next. The book is nothing like that. Tolkien sets the lore, the slow pace gives the story depth, and you feel immersed in the world he creates. It’s been quite a surprise for me to approach the stories this way, and I really enjoy it so far.
- The Hobbits are much more mature, fully realized characters than they are in the movie. Don’t get me wrong, I thought they were portrayed incredibly well by Elijah Wood and the likes, but in the films the Hobbits are a bit more whimsical and kinda tailor made for movies. Frodo is the lead, Pippin and Merry are the comic relief, and Sam is the glue that holds it together. But in the books, Merry and Pippin are far smarter and less bumbling than they are in the movies. Sam is still a loyal companion, but he has fears and flaws. All four just seem smarter, more capable, and fully realized than they are in the movie.
- Extra characters. I love the bickering of the Hobbits in the Shire, it makes it feel like an old folk’s home, but moreover they just have the sort of traits that make characters whole. The Black Riders are far more shadowy and creeping in the books, especially in Frodo’s dreams. They meet Gildor and the elves long before they even arrive in Rivendell - I loved that scene! And Fatty Bolger, Tom Bombadil… what great characters. There’s so much more to enjoy in the book already.
I’ll share more of my impressions after I finish all three if this post is interesting to people. But the main takeaway for me so far is… man, reading is so much more enjoyable when there’s no one breathing down your neck. I’m so fortunate I get to read these books, and I wish I had earlier.
I’m also currently reading LOTR for the first time after believing I would hate it my whole life—at some point when I was a kid I had heard that they were absurdly difficult and dull, and I kinda soaked that in. I’m so glad I decided to read them now.
I’m most of the way through The Fellowship and already looking forward to rereading…I don’t want to reread books very often. They are so immersive.
Have you read The Hobbit?
But I feel the same way you do with several of the classics. There were so many books I was forced to read in middle and high school that I probably would have gotten so much more out of (in terms of enjoyment, and also in terms of understanding/processing them) if I had been allowed to just read them. Having to read (actually: skim) 250 pages per night on top of other homework and answer questions about random, tiny (usually completely irrelevant) details to “prove” I had done so completely ruined the experience of reading them and, yeah, reduced my enjoyment of reading as a whole for awhile.