Interesting article from NPR.

  • kiltguy2112@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    The problem is that not everyone in Montana has the same standards. If you dislike a book that is in your local library, don’t read it, but you have not right to have it removed so that others can read it.

    • Mike_Michaelson@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Naw, courts have already determined the constitutionality of libraries being able to remove items based upon local community boards of education and boards of libraries who are open to influence by community groups. You may not like those who petition removal or libraries that remove, but none of it is illegal or undemocratic.

    • Mike_Michaelson@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Regardless of your downvotes the fact remains that not including certain books and/or removing them based upon community petition is more democratic than keeping them in the library against the wishes of the community. A minority’s complaints doesn’t always overrule the majority’s when both sides are fully capable of petitioning for their position and having it implemented.

      As a reader of literature I don’t like the current basis of the effort to remove books, but I accept it as part of our democratic system; it’s better than a dictate that you must keep certain books in the library.