I LOVE Alfonso Cuarón’s sci-fi action movie Children of Men. I’ve watched maybe six times and every time, the ending always almost brings me to tears. So when I learned it was adapted from P.D. James’ book of the same name, it was a no-brainer deciding what my next book would be.
After finishing the book, it wasn’t difficult to reach to the conclusion that I enjoyed the movie better.
While James’ book gives a more in-depth look at how human infertility and humanity’s slow death march towards extinction affects the sexual dynamic between men and women and almost demented ways humans try to cope with a world without children or a race of dead men walking, I feel the book dedicates WAY too much time describing the failing of human civilization and the Regrets and guilt of Theo Faron. It’s not even until after 2/3 through the book where it feels like the plot and story are properly paced and stuff of consequence actually begin to happen.
The film’s adaptation by, comparison, feels consistent in its pacing and the world building and woe-is-mes of Theo feel more compact a take up less of the audience’s time.
What books do you feel were worse than its film adaptation and why?
Ready player one. Actually kinda liked the movie
I disagree. The book was more nostalgic and cohesive. The movie was meh.
The edgy atheism rant did it for me.
I’m not religious at all, but Wade’s character is written to be so pretentious I couldn’t handle it.
Fair point. I listened to it as an audiobook with narration by Wil Wheaton who I guess does a convincing edgy and pretentious atheism! lol
I prefer the movie as well. Not only did key characters not die but I didn’t have to go through endless eighties lists of media. That was maddening in the book.
Wade in the book is a Mary Sue and I hate him. His plans always go off without a hitch and exactly as intended.