I saw someone post in here the other day about how they didn’t enjoy a relatively new, very popular book. I’ve seen a lot of people say this about this novel, very suddenly—after weeks of positive reviews about it. Since then, I’ve been thinking about how readers should navigate reviews when picking a book in this new era of reading.
In the past, people mostly just said or wrote exactly what they felt and you made your decision based off of thoughts around the author’s skill and the themes explored in the book. Now, it’s loads of paid and/or heavily embellished reviews that mislead the reader, which leads to more people reading a book that they would’ve never read otherwise and having a negative experience. I think that makes reviews more unreliable now than they’ve ever been. (It also lessens the quality of the books receiving accolades overtime, but I digress.)
That’s not to say that there aren’t good book reviewers, but that market is very saturated and very few of them do at least a little literary analysis on these titles before highly recommending them as a “life changing” read. (Goodreads is the exact opposite, everyone is a critic and it leaves you even more confused on if a book is even worth looking at, lol.)
So, what’s your process when deciding on what book to read? How do you navigate reviews? What draws you to or turns you away from a book? Are you successful at avoiding bad reads?
There are authors I like whose other work I’ll happily try. There are classics that sound worthwhile. There are a few friends whose recommendations are consistently excellent.
Other than that? It’s a crapshoot. I can filter out certain works based on the synopsis or author, but that’s about it. And of course, even authors I like or classics can end up being massive disappointments.