coming from a Marvel fan lmao…

Its not a copy, its a transformation using linear algebra. Do artists get sued if they simply viewed someone else’s painting years ago and don’t attribute credit?

The issue is 99% of lawyers dont have a mathematics or computer science background to actually what is fundamentally happening, these are not copies, it’s a linear algebra transformation. Only 1 data point exists in the inference matrix for every 10,000 to 100,000 data points in the training data. Is it copying if an artist views 10,000 paintings and that artist doesn’t attribute credit to each of the 10,000 paintings?

Making AI systems is art; do you know how difficult it is to generate new algorithms or research papers out of thin air with only your mind, it is by definition creative.

Its trained on real art, but that art is not accessible at inference time. Only the matrix of weights (numbers between 0 and 1) are accessible when you ask an AI system a question; there are typically 10 - 100 billion weights.

Its not memorization, it is transformation and projection into a high level vector space. It may seem like memorization to you because you do not understand linear algebra…

Do you know how hard it is to invent new algorithms? You are literally creating new things that never existed with only your mind/ideas, its creative by definition.

Also the same people that brought you the internet but looks like you have no issue with that if you posted here? Even Bill Gates sees the massive change that is about to happen. Machine learning has been a research area for 50 years, it’s nothing like NFTs.

https://www.reddit.com/r/ArtificialInteligence/comments/17rrd6h/ai_is_about_to_completely_change_how_you_use/