Dickens had the same effect on me: he just wasn’t that deep, and so it’s easy to go overboard in analyzing it. Maybe A Tale of Two Cities deserves it, but most of his stuff is just soap operas from a century ago. If you just read it as light reading it’s fun.
Dickens had the same effect on me: he just wasn’t that deep, and so it’s easy to go overboard in analyzing it. Maybe A Tale of Two Cities deserves it, but most of his stuff is just soap operas from a century ago. If you just read it as light reading it’s fun.