I came across Battle Beast’s FANDOM page and in trivia, some complete imbecile added “There was a small theory that the reason Omni-Man was seen watching Invincible and Guardians lose to Battle Beast was because Nolan was afraid of him”.
That makes me wonder, do people have shit for brains? If I write a character as a narrative tool to explore invulnerability or godhood in the hands of a regular guy, why do people keep coming up with these goddamn moronic hypotheses? Even when in the comics, Thokk is defeated by a Viltrumite. It threw me in a white hot seething boil.
Is this some sort of litmus test to find out if someone can tie their own shoes? Whether they compare the power level of a Superman archetype to various villains-of-the-weeks?
Nolan isn’t the strongest viltrumite, and there is an empire of them, Superman is one of the last of his race, and is arguably the strongest of the ones who remain.
who actually argues about that
OP is arguing that the idea of battle-beast being a threat to Nolan ruins the entire show. Apparently reddit can argue about anything.
Nolan isn’t even the strongest alien. The LoL character dudes can one-shot him