I came across Battle Beast’s FANDOM page and in trivia, some complete imbecile added “There was a small theory that the reason Omni-Man was seen watching Invincible and Guardians lose to Battle Beast was because Nolan was afraid of him”.
That makes me wonder, do people have shit for brains? If I write a character as a narrative tool to explore invulnerability or godhood in the hands of a regular guy, why do people keep coming up with these goddamn moronic hypotheses? Even when in the comics, Thokk is defeated by a Viltrumite. It threw me in a white hot seething boil.
Is this some sort of litmus test to find out if someone can tie their own shoes? Whether they compare the power level of a Superman archetype to various villains-of-the-weeks?
I agree with you but in this scenario even if Nolan didn’t know it there’s a good chance he would lose. If he had a close fight with thrag and thrag easily beats omniman it’s a fair assumption