The complaint was filed by Julian Sancton on behalf of a group of nonfiction authors who said they were not compensated for the use of their books and academic journals in training the company's large language model.
As a software guy, I am curious about how this case is going to go. AI is surely a Wild West now, and models are becoming more and more into black boxes. How can they prove that the text was used in the training? Can prompt responses from an AI be taken as testimony in court? Interesting questions.
As a software guy, I am curious about how this case is going to go. AI is surely a Wild West now, and models are becoming more and more into black boxes. How can they prove that the text was used in the training? Can prompt responses from an AI be taken as testimony in court? Interesting questions.