• Pathogenesls@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    This lawsuit will result in the same outcome as the previous ones.

    It really seems like a lot of people have no idea how LLMs work.

    • RealHaneulPark@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Nah, mate, I reckon this lawsuit might shake things up a bit. Can’t just brush it off like the previous ones. LLMs are powerful, but authors have rights too, ya know? Gotta find a balance, 'cause creativity shouldn’t be stolen. Let’s see how this pans out. Exciting times ahead! #CopyrightDrama

      • Exist50@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Can’t just brush it off like the previous ones

        Why not? They don’t seem to present any new arguments.

    • Exist50@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.

      - Upton Sinclair

  • PersonalitySeveral51@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    As a software guy, I am curious about how this case is going to go. AI is surely a Wild West now, and models are becoming more and more into black boxes. How can they prove that the text was used in the training? Can prompt responses from an AI be taken as testimony in court? Interesting questions.