amrit-9037@alien.topB to BooksEnglish · 10 months agoOpenAI And Microsoft Sued By Nonfiction Writers For Alleged ‘Rampant Theft’ Of Authors’ Workswww.forbes.comexternal-linkmessage-square106fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkOpenAI And Microsoft Sued By Nonfiction Writers For Alleged ‘Rampant Theft’ Of Authors’ Workswww.forbes.comamrit-9037@alien.topB to BooksEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square106fedilink
minus-squareErikT738@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 months agoYou do realize you’re contradicting yourself, right?
minus-squareNot_That_Magical@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 months agoNope. Journals being accessible to everyone in an archive does not mean AI models should have carte blanche consent to use them to train.
minus-squaregoj1ra@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 months agoI understand what you’re going for, but that might be tricky legally. What special status does the archive have that allows it to make all that information accessible, that an AI model wouldn’t have?
minus-squareNot_That_Magical@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 months agoThe law is fucked and needs to catch up to AI stuff. DMCA, fair use etc is not built to handle scraping on the level AI does.
You do realize you’re contradicting yourself, right?
Nope. Journals being accessible to everyone in an archive does not mean AI models should have carte blanche consent to use them to train.
I understand what you’re going for, but that might be tricky legally. What special status does the archive have that allows it to make all that information accessible, that an AI model wouldn’t have?
The law is fucked and needs to catch up to AI stuff. DMCA, fair use etc is not built to handle scraping on the level AI does.