You’re speaking for the researchers. What they want is a free, public archive which already exists(not legally though). AI is not there to make an archive.

The law is fucked and needs to catch up to AI stuff. DMCA, fair use etc is not built to handle scraping on the level AI does.

There is no dissonance. I don’t think AI models should be getting stuff, because they’re not a public archive. They are using it to build a data model. There’s a difference between commercial use, which is the goal of AI companies, and spreading knowledge and research.

That’s not dissonance.

Nope. Journals being accessible to everyone in an archive does not mean AI models should have carte blanche consent to use them to train.

Academic journals should be free and available for everyone, they shouldn’t be getting fed into AI without permission.

The annotated version really makes it clear how much thought, references and craft was put into the book