Feeding it into AI’s is one of the things countless researchers would love to do with scientific literature in order to fuel more discoveries for the benefit of everyone.
but the parasitic journal owners try to heavily restrict what you can do with the text even after you’ve paid out the nose to publish and paid out the nose for subscriptions.
You’re speaking for the researchers. What they want is a free, public archive which already exists(not legally though). AI is not there to make an archive.
Well, if it’s just so people have to pay openAI to get access to knowledge instead of having to pay Elsevier, it’s not really what I personally want to be honest…
Feeding it into AI’s is one of the things countless researchers would love to do with scientific literature in order to fuel more discoveries for the benefit of everyone.
but the parasitic journal owners try to heavily restrict what you can do with the text even after you’ve paid out the nose to publish and paid out the nose for subscriptions.
You’re speaking for the researchers. What they want is a free, public archive which already exists(not legally though). AI is not there to make an archive.
Well, if it’s just so people have to pay openAI to get access to knowledge instead of having to pay Elsevier, it’s not really what I personally want to be honest…