Because it is. No legal scholar seriously doubts that argument. It comfortably meets all the requirements.
Rationalization placed on the big corporations having good lawyers.
Lmao, and you think abolishing fair use is somehow a win for people over corporations? Now I know you’re just trolling.
You seriously think thats what I’m arguing for? Or are you composing a strawman to comfort yourself? Asking for data laundering scams to be regulated so they don’t replace the working class’s jobs the moment it makes a mega corporation a single buck should not be insane. It doesn’t mean abolishing fair use. Helpful idiots like you are what these companies are depending on though.
I thought I told you to spare me the frivolous argument … go bootlick somewhere else.
Rationalization placed on the big corporations having good lawyers.
I’m not talking about just OpenAI’s lawyers. This is actually a very clear-cut matter, despite your attempts to throw doubt on it.
You seriously think thats what I’m arguing for?
Quite literally, yes. Training an AI model is rather clearly fair use, so to make that illegal, you need to either abolish fair use, or severely limit it from its current scope.
Asking for data laundering scams to be regulated so they don’t replace the working class’s jobs the moment it makes a mega corporation a single buck
And I’m sure you would have also suggested that we ban the automated loom for putting weavers out of business. There’s a reason the Luddites lost.
What is it with you AI circlejerkers and constantly calling people Luddites?
Calling a spade a spade. You have a better term for someone who wants to hold back technology because it threatens some small population in an existing industry?
Yeah it’s called not insulting other people because you’re irrationally angry and can’t defend your argument without trying to talk down to people who have different opinions then you
Because it is. No legal scholar seriously doubts that argument. It comfortably meets all the requirements.
Lmao, and you think abolishing fair use is somehow a win for people over corporations? Now I know you’re just trolling.
Rationalization placed on the big corporations having good lawyers.
You seriously think thats what I’m arguing for? Or are you composing a strawman to comfort yourself? Asking for data laundering scams to be regulated so they don’t replace the working class’s jobs the moment it makes a mega corporation a single buck should not be insane. It doesn’t mean abolishing fair use. Helpful idiots like you are what these companies are depending on though.
I thought I told you to spare me the frivolous argument … go bootlick somewhere else.
I’m not talking about just OpenAI’s lawyers. This is actually a very clear-cut matter, despite your attempts to throw doubt on it.
Quite literally, yes. Training an AI model is rather clearly fair use, so to make that illegal, you need to either abolish fair use, or severely limit it from its current scope.
And I’m sure you would have also suggested that we ban the automated loom for putting weavers out of business. There’s a reason the Luddites lost.
What is it with you AI circlejerkers and constantly calling people Luddites?
Calling a spade a spade. You have a better term for someone who wants to hold back technology because it threatens some small population in an existing industry?
Yeah it’s called not insulting other people because you’re irrationally angry and can’t defend your argument without trying to talk down to people who have different opinions then you
Oh please. The comment I’m responding to is engaging in blatant bad faith. I give a 1:1 analogy of what they’re proposing, and that’s an insult?