Source?

Microsoft has always wanted to keep him. The OpenAI board fired him for ideological reasons/power struggle, realized they would be killing the entire company, and decided to salvage the company even at the cost of their jobs.

And that explains why he’s now back? And has had MS’s support the entire time?

Oh please. The comment I’m responding to is engaging in blatant bad faith. I give a 1:1 analogy of what they’re proposing, and that’s an insult?

What is it with you AI circlejerkers and constantly calling people Luddites?

Calling a spade a spade. You have a better term for someone who wants to hold back technology because it threatens some small population in an existing industry?

Going to be fun to see the influx of “case dismissed” articles in a few months though.

Rationalization placed on the big corporations having good lawyers.

I’m not talking about just OpenAI’s lawyers. This is actually a very clear-cut matter, despite your attempts to throw doubt on it.

You seriously think thats what I’m arguing for?

Quite literally, yes. Training an AI model is rather clearly fair use, so to make that illegal, you need to either abolish fair use, or severely limit it from its current scope.

Asking for data laundering scams to be regulated so they don’t replace the working class’s jobs the moment it makes a mega corporation a single buck

And I’m sure you would have also suggested that we ban the automated loom for putting weavers out of business. There’s a reason the Luddites lost.

If you are buying the hoax that genAI’s data laundering scheme is fair use

Because it is. No legal scholar seriously doubts that argument. It comfortably meets all the requirements.

It is truly depressing to see so many people watch massive mega corporations practice unrestrained access to our property and personal data

Lmao, and you think abolishing fair use is somehow a win for people over corporations? Now I know you’re just trolling.

Justice would be them having to pay the defense’s legal fees for filing a frivolous suit.

Can’t just brush it off like the previous ones

Why not? They don’t seem to present any new arguments.

It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.

- Upton Sinclair