I was forced to read the Fellowship of the Ring in eighth grade, and I hated every goddamn word of it. I knew there was something in there I probably liked, but the pressure, time constraints, and looming chapter quizzes sucked any enjoyment there was to be had from that book.

Years later the movies came out, and as we all know they were incredible. I will never forget seeing the battle of Minas Tirith on the big screen, but I’ve also made so many wonderful memories over the years watching and rewatching those films with friends.

I developed a love for reading once school ended (go figure), but the lingering hatred for the Lord of the Rings books was too strong for me to jump back in to them. Then a few months ago I saw the trilogy on a bookshelf at my parent’s house, and figured they wouldn’t mind if I borrowed them.

I’m about 150 pages in, and man… it is so enjoyable to read these books today, after all these years. I still wish I could have enjoyed them as a young man, but I am soaking in the experience of truly reading The Lord of the Rings for the first time.

Some observations on the book as opposed to the movies:

  1. The pace is so much different. The first movie starts with a frantic pace, which I loved. The adventure shoots out the gate the day Frodo chances on the ring, every sequence in the film has clear and high stakes, and every scene bleeds into the next. The book is nothing like that. Tolkien sets the lore, the slow pace gives the story depth, and you feel immersed in the world he creates. It’s been quite a surprise for me to approach the stories this way, and I really enjoy it so far.
  2. The Hobbits are much more mature, fully realized characters than they are in the movie. Don’t get me wrong, I thought they were portrayed incredibly well by Elijah Wood and the likes, but in the films the Hobbits are a bit more whimsical and kinda tailor made for movies. Frodo is the lead, Pippin and Merry are the comic relief, and Sam is the glue that holds it together. But in the books, Merry and Pippin are far smarter and less bumbling than they are in the movies. Sam is still a loyal companion, but he has fears and flaws. All four just seem smarter, more capable, and fully realized than they are in the movie.
  3. Extra characters. I love the bickering of the Hobbits in the Shire, it makes it feel like an old folk’s home, but moreover they just have the sort of traits that make characters whole. The Black Riders are far more shadowy and creeping in the books, especially in Frodo’s dreams. They meet Gildor and the elves long before they even arrive in Rivendell - I loved that scene! And Fatty Bolger, Tom Bombadil… what great characters. There’s so much more to enjoy in the book already.

I’ll share more of my impressions after I finish all three if this post is interesting to people. But the main takeaway for me so far is… man, reading is so much more enjoyable when there’s no one breathing down your neck. I’m so fortunate I get to read these books, and I wish I had earlier.

  • DazzlerPlus@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s the problem though is that you have to twist their arms hard to read it. If you don’t, absolutely none of them will read it

    • Dana07620@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you don’t, absolutely none of them will read it

      Great Expectations?

      Or any assigned reading?

      Because I can tell you that out of all the assigned reading in high school, the only one that I had to be “forced” to read was The Scarlet Letter. I did not like that book. Everything else may have been assigned reading, but I enjoyed reading them.

    • KiwiTheKitty@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah I don’t know, I feel like kids aren’t given enough time in school to read anymore. My niece has an assigned hour of reading of anything she wants every week, and it’s pretty easy for her because she likes reading, but I think about all the kids who don’t have books at home or don’t have parents who will bring them to the library or who don’t like it because it doesn’t come easy to them or who have a lot of extracurriculars… when I was in middle school, which wasn’t very long ago, we had an hour of quiet reading built into our schedule every week and everybody loved it. Like idk if schools care about reading scores dropping, maybe they should give kids space to read.

      High school with assigned books is a little harder, but we still had time in class to read. Although then my enjoyment heavily depended on which English teacher I had… I remember hating all the books I read the semester my English teacher was terrible (told us what to think without giving us any room for discussion, played favorites with a couple of the boys and punished girls for everything, etc)

      • DazzlerPlus@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        For sure. Time is always at a premium, though there have been initiatives like DEAR to get students straight up reading in class. I’ve also seen an interesting case study where an elementary teacher trained the kids to have a book on hand at all times and to read at the slightest lull, like waiting in line for the bathroom.

        One of the biggest issues is enforcement. It’s hard to verify that a kid is silently reading