Block me then? I don’t actually care what you do. You’re just one more frothing anon on the internet.

I will say your rantings are absolutely delusional. So-called TERFs don’t want bad things and don’t hate people. They don’t ally with Nazis - strange how you view people wanting safe spaces for marginalised people and better care for children as what Nazis want. Nazis were the ones who experimented on children in actual, literal fact. Nazis might have shown up AT a KJK event, but they weren’t invited by her. KJK events are called Let Women Speak.

You can have your opinion that my opinions are bigoted - that’s fine. But it’s not misinformation.

Oh right. Here we go again.

It genuinely doesn’t matter what I (or anyone) say does it? Trans women are trans women. Women are women. Women deserve their spaces away from male humans, and I’m sorry if that hurts their feelings. I don’t hate them. I don’t even think about them on a day to day basis.

But anything less than 100% agreement and capitulation to what you believe about yourself, and apparently I hate you and want you to die.

The opposite of disagreement is actually not hate and death threats. Unless of course, you disagree with so-called TERFs in which case go ahead and post stuff like this.

My comment was not disingenuous. But yours is certainly hyperbolic, bordering on ridiculous.

That’s the reason why so many women love her is precisely for her refusal to back down. Rowling has enough clout and money behind her to not have to think about potentially losing her job over the apparently controversial opinion that women are women and trans women are trans women.

And the reason it’s always trans women? Because the power lays - and always has done - with males. A man telling the world he is a woman holds more clout than a woman telling the world he isn’t.

Thanks but I’ve read everything she’s put out, other than her books ironically.

What do you think her true views are? Considering she has not once said anything about wishing death on trans people (or anyone) which is more than I can say for her detractors who are seemingly quite happy to support the people that post stuff like this.

But those never seem to count. It’s only when women say no that people seem to get up in arms.

All Rowling has ever said is that women deserve their own spaces and words. For females. Because male-born trans women are not and will never have the same experiences or fears. It’s not bigoted to say that.

What that has got to do with debating someone’s existence I don’t know.

Do ‘bigots’ deserve to have thousands of rape and death and violence threats and doxxing attempts thrown at them? Because that’s what it seems some people think the opposite of ‘not owing politeness to bigots’ means.

I’d recommend reading what the woman herself said and not a third party with a clear agenda interpreting it for you.

I said this on another thread and was roundly told it’s acshually a totally ok spelling and pronunciation.

I mean, I can accept it’s dialect but in an audiobook it’s unforgivable.

I very rarely read real books now, almost exclusively on kindle. But books I love, I will buy a nice edition for my shelf. I miss the physical feel of a nice book and the cover art.

This won’t be popular - but I couldn’t get through The House in the Cerulean Sea. It should have been WAY more interesting than it is. I got 58% through before abandoning.