The way the Harry Potter fandom (and the reading community at large tbh) casually overlook the myriad of disturbing and offensive content in these novels is shocking to me. Especially given how many professed fans of the series are grown adults.

(Spoilers for themes, plot, and worldbuilding of Harry Potter)

!The slavery apologia is by far the most disturbing content in Rowling’s work. I cannot believe a novel that was published in the year 2000 has extended passages of characters lifting arguments in favor of slavery verbatim from real world historical arguments that slave owners and racists used to justify holding human beings in chattel slavery, while at the same time continuously ridiculing Hermione as hysterical SJW for trying to advocate for the rights and freedoms of enslaved peoples. And yet the fandom will talk circles around you about how because the enslaved group (house-elves) are a fantasy race, that makes it totally acceptable to enslave them and repeat real world arguments that were made when holding African peoples in bondage in the Americas.!<

!The way people uphold Rowling’s books as radical anti-prejudice tomes of social justice while completely sweeping under the rug the ways in which she characterizes non-human creatures with vile racist caricatures is awful. House-elves are basically walking Uncle Tom stereotypes who love to be abused and mistreated slave workers. Goblins embody all of the horrid tropes of antisemitism with their huge noses and disfigured faces, associations with banking and wealth hoarding, and constant description as conniving and greedy. And the centaurs are coded as indigenous peoples who engage in capturing humans who stray onto their protective lands to meet violent and lurid fates.!<

!Rowling certainly isn’t a stranger to other forms of prejudice in her writing either. Her fatphobia is well documented in both Harry Potter and her later adult novels, which obese individuals being dehumanized in cruel and corpus descriptions of their bodies and attitudes. Rowling’s well documented transphobia is on full display with villainous character of Rita Skeeter, who’s constantly described as ugly, mannish in appearance, and with other non-traditionally feminine characteristics that are meant to make the reader feel put off by her.!<

!The series in general does not hold up to a feminist reading either. Women and girls in the series receive constant scrutiny and ridicule for both the crime of being ugly, and the crime of being too pretty/overly concerned with their appearances. The text in general heavily emphasizes parenthood (and especially motherhood) as the best and most righteous path for someone to follow, and indeed most of the characters we are meant to view as good who survive the series end up married with children. Though this heteronormative and judgmental outlook on gender and family isn’t really much of a surprise given what we know now about Rowling’s own personal believes on those things.!<

It’s just all so awful, and it pains me to see so many readers simultaneously try and tout themselves as politically enlightened and socially accepting while turning a blind eye to all the terrible content in this series that’s meant for children.

  • SquirrelTeamSix@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Get the hell over it. I don’t agree with much that you wrote, but even if this were all true not everyone needs to live a sheltered mindless life. Bad things happen in real life and in books. Read what you like and leave others alone

    • early_onset_villainy@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Calm down. They’re analysing the work of a multimillionaire. It’s healthy to view works through a critical lens. You don’t need to get angry or nasty about it.

    • Handyandy58@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      How does the OP at all seem to reflect someone who lives a “sheltered mindless life?” They seem to have good exposure to many historical ideas and the intellectual tools to apply them in literary analysis of one of the most popular book franchises of all time.

      • math-is-magic@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Squirrel is the one with the sheltered mindset. So sheltered they have to believe that OP is making shit up because they can’t imagine the world outside their self-absorbed little bubble.

  • malsomnus@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    It never ceases to amaze me how people list all these woke crimes in works of fiction and completely ignore non-woke crimes. If immorality in a work of fiction bothered me (which it absolutely doesn’t), I think that stereotyping imaginary creatures would receive a lower priority after all the rampant child abuse.

      • math-is-magic@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        A Deadly Education by Naomi Novic, for one. It’s definitely not in the same vein as HP, as it’s a a very grim capitalism allegory, but it’s still an excellent trilogy. Dives into the depth of what a magical school could be more creatively than hogwarts, imo, and comes away with a much more optimistic and hopeful and encouraging worldview than HP did, despite its grim setting.

    • snowwhistle1@alien.topOPB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Glad to know you laughed during the subplot where everyone demeaned Hermione for trying to fight back against chattel slavery.

      • VenoVlade@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh I’ll clear it up, my ancestors didn’t engage in worldwide colonizing and chattel slavery! It’s easy to enjoy a good book when you don’t worry about the crimes of the past. Lucky for me :)

  • BBords9296@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    All this did was point out that you don’t know how to read or write critically… unless of course this is satire. If that’s the case keep the course because this is terrifying yet beautiful.

    • Skatterbrayne@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      So what do you think Rowling wanted to convey with her description of house elves and their treatment by the wizarding world? You think it was actually a critique or something?

      • BBords9296@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        To show the complexities of slavery. How about to create a sympathetic group of characters, so that Dobby can rise from them and become a hero after interacting with the main hero. How about adding just adding more evil to the wizarding world for our hero to overcome or rise above? I can keep going if you want, but to stop at racism seems a bit childish if you are serious about writing.

  • AcanthaceaeNo1687@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Am I supposed to feel guilty for enjoying Harry Potter because of your list of psychotic rants? Because I don’t.

  • Luvke@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Upon this basis we would “need” to discard entire genres.

    You’re welcome to do so but most of us just aren’t going to.

  • ILoveMy-KindlePW@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    You are on the Steven Universe subreddit, ergo I’m not gonna read how you felt personally offended by a saga made for children

  • Adventurous_Lie_4141@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t see it being grossly overlooked, your just in the wrong parts of the fandom. I follow several people on tiktok that break down the books and use them to make very good points about the things that are wrong with the books and the social cometary they present. One is a WHOLE ASS PROFESSOR that teaches the subject in a college and films his lectures, and their all about the problematic things in the fandom and critically thinking about them.

    It’s fine your upset about these things but don’t blast the fandom cuz you found yourself on the wrong side of the internet. Don’t blame us for your algorithm.