I came across Battle Beast’s FANDOM page and in trivia, some complete imbecile added “There was a small theory that the reason Omni-Man was seen watching Invincible and Guardians lose to Battle Beast was because Nolan was afraid of him”.
That makes me wonder, do people have shit for brains? If I write a character as a narrative tool to explore invulnerability or godhood in the hands of a regular guy, why do people keep coming up with these goddamn moronic hypotheses? Even when in the comics, Thokk is defeated by a Viltrumite. It threw me in a white hot seething boil.
Is this some sort of litmus test to find out if someone can tie their own shoes? Whether they compare the power level of a Superman archetype to various villains-of-the-weeks?
If you read the comics, you’d know that BB would destroy Omni-Man.
I read the comics, hence why I’m saying what I’m saying. ;)
Then how was there no chance of Nolan being afraid?
Even though he can’t fly? Why can’t Nolan just remain elevated and continually drop massive objects on BB and launch an array of arial attacks without ever coming in striking distance?
Because Battle Beast can jump and those attacks would do nothing to him. Also, if Nolan can drop those massive objects, BB can throw them at like 30+ mph.
Even though he can’t fly? Why can’t Nolan just remain elevated and continually drop massive objects on BB and launch an array of arial attacks without ever coming in striking distance?