I’d love to hear y’alls opinion on “sending money home”.
Manuel had expectations of sending $250-$300 home per month while living in the US, which is a little wild when he can’t even work yet and seemingly hasn’t discussed it with Ashley at all.
On the other hand, he has multiple kids to support, something they don’t seem to show them talking about at all. And $300 in the US is significantly easier to come by than $300 in Ecuador, where the “average living wage” is around $500USD/month.
It tends to come up every season or so, obviously there’s some outrageous people looking to take advantage of others, but on the other hand a couple hundred bucks goes a lot further in some countries than others, and is typically a lot easier to make in some countries than others.
I’m reminded of David and Annie when they met with the builder after TLC killed her mom - the builder clearly saw David as easy pickings and gave them a wildly inflated quote, but also that’s around 5-10% of what that quote would have been in any American city.
What are your opinions on this? I think some people are out there to take advantage of others, but on the other hand if I could pay for my entire spouses family to live reasonably well for a small slice of my monthly take home pay it seems like a no-brainer to do it?
I think of course! If his kids are in another country, it is the very least he and she can do. They aren’t grown, they are teenagers. When you sign up to marry a person with children (who is NOT trying to support them) that should be more of a redder flag than asking for money to send them. It means he is responsible. She brought him to another country where he can’t work. Why didn’t she think she should pitch in to support his kids for that amount of time he cannot work. BTW why is that even a rule??? Seems stupid for the embassy to require they don’t work. Do any of you know the reasoning behind the rule?