I saw a couple of posts about writing book reviews and I agree.

Most folks simply read a book and move on. Few take the time and effort to write A review - long or short. But I think readers should take the time to share their views - great, good, bad or atrocious. Even ‘roasting’ a book that you simply hated is okay as long it is constructive feedback to share with fellow readers.

While books by ‘tier 1’ authors generate thousands of reviews on Amazon, Goodreads and elsewhere, a vast majority of books end up with one or two reviews. And even those few reviews are probably solicited reviews.

Writers yearn for feedback, especially in a digital era where reviews on forums like Goodreads and Amazon can make or break sales and ratings.

Let us keep reviewing to motivate writers!

  • melloniel@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I try to write reviews for most of I read because I’m passionate about it, but I don’t write for every single thing. Sometimes I just don’t have anything to say and that’s okay.

    Reviews are for readers, not for the author.

  • Budget-Addendum-9504@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I love writing reviews on Goodreads. I first started doing it to just keep notes of my thoughts of the books I read, but I’ve genuinely started getting into writing thoughtful reviews! Agreed on feedback for writers, but I also noticed it helps increase my overall comprehension of the books.

  • dear-mycologistical@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I enjoy writing reviews, in general, but I don’t review every book I read, and I don’t feel particularly bad about that. I read for fun, on my own time. I do not feel an obligation to someone whose book I bought or checked out from the library. Unless I’m reading an ARC, it is not my job to give the writer feedback. I’m not their editor.

  • ooder57@alien.top
    cake
    B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Reviews have never swayed me from any sort of entertainment media one way or the other.

    What one critic or review calls an abomination, ends up being my holy grail.

    Everyone has a different perspective, a different taste, a different understanding…but mostly, a bias.

    Reviews, from the point of view of finding an actual good read, are useless. Reviews only help sell books. Which is great for the author, but greater for the publishing house, and rarely impactful on someone like me in my choices.

    The blurb/synopsis should be what sells the book, not what everyone and anyone else thinks.

  • apri11a@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t write reviews. I use Goodreads, using their star system as was described when I started using it and I usually leave a note for myself about what I thought.

  • th4d3stroy3d@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Totally agree. I’ve been trying to write them as I finish them on goodreads, but I don’t write them for the ones I give up on for one reason or another.

  • VerbalAcrobatics@alien.top
    cake
    B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve written some reviews. They don’t get much attention, which makes me think I’m not good at writing reviews.

    • ottprim@alien.top
      cake
      B
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Totally agree. And the quality of the reviews out there is amazingly bad.

  • cocaineheart101@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    True, I try to write reviews no matter how short and regardless of my feelings towards the book especially if it has very few reviews on goodreads. Can’t stress the amount of times I’ve seen writers say how much feedback matters to them whether it’s positive or negative.

  • hildkriem@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I always heard that authors never read reviews of their own books and that it is recommended for them like that - because both good and bad just mess with their head.

  • AllWhiteInk@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t read reviews 'cos I don’t know the reviewer (taste, attitude, education…) - or if it’s a bought review.

    And that’s why I don’t write reviews, either.

  • Eceleb-follower@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I rate, but I rate for myself. I don’t write a sales pitch, or anything like that. I use reviews for myself, to remember how I felt reading it. Over the years, some books kind of slip your mind and it’s fun reading how much you hated or enjoyed it at the time.

    Or even more common, when reading non fiction, it all flying past your head, then it all starts making sense over time.

  • mint_pumpkins@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The only obligation readers have toward writers is paying them for their books in my opinion. I review books on Goodreads but only for myself and other readers and I don’t take them seriously as it’s not my job. I’ve done my part, I’ve paid the writers, anything beyond that is extra and good on people who do go and write reviews but it’s not something I think people should be pressured to do.

    It’s the same as restaurants, mechanics, any service you pay for. If you decide to write a review that’s great, but I don’t think it’s cool to pressure people who don’t want to.

  • chortlingabacus@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Screw that, I wrote a review once and did I get an email from Sappho thanking me for writing it? in a pig’s eye I did. If it was feedback she was yearning for she had a funny way of showing it,