I came across Battle Beast’s FANDOM page and in trivia, some complete imbecile added “There was a small theory that the reason Omni-Man was seen watching Invincible and Guardians lose to Battle Beast was because Nolan was afraid of him”.

That makes me wonder, do people have shit for brains? If I write a character as a narrative tool to explore invulnerability or godhood in the hands of a regular guy, why do people keep coming up with these goddamn moronic hypotheses? Even when in the comics, Thokk is defeated by a Viltrumite. It threw me in a white hot seething boil.

Is this some sort of litmus test to find out if someone can tie their own shoes? Whether they compare the power level of a Superman archetype to various villains-of-the-weeks?

  • BeekeeperJack@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I read that scene in a different way. I think Nolan didn’t intervene because he wanted to see how mark fared against extra terrestrial threats, which are very different from something to be found on earth. Keep in mind he was still intending at that time for mark to be a part of his takeover of earth. That also goes along the lines of one of the things I love about invincible: the strongest beings in the universe aren’t necessarily even all from earth, whereas in marvel and dc, earth is narratively and sometimes literally the center of the universe.